Home > Error Codes > Smtp Enhanced Error Codes

Smtp Enhanced Error Codes


This code is only useful for permanent errors. Note that this response code is documented here for historical purposes only. Status Code Structure .........................................3 3. Thanks for your visit! news

Use of these status codes may disclose additional information about how an internal mail system is implemented beyond that currently available. Hansen & Klensin Best Current Practice [Page 4] RFC 5248 SMTP Enhanced Status Code Registry June 2008 2.4. Because of this, a new set of codes were created. Vaudreuil IESG X.2.1 Mailbox disabled, not accepting messages Not given The mailbox exists, but is not accepting messages. official site

Smtp Reply Codes

All Rights Reserved

en results found Do These help? This is useful only as a persistent transient error. Since then, various RFCs have been published and internet drafts proposed that define additional status codes. Klensin IESG X.2.0 Other or undefined mailbox status Not given The mailbox exists, but something about the destination mailbox has caused the sending of this DSN. [RFC3463] (Standards Track) G.

  • X.3.5 Bad system configuration The system is not configured in a manner that will permit it to accept this mail.     3.5 Network and routing status X.4.0   Undefined network or
  • X.2.3 Message length exceeds administrative limit A per-mailbox administrative message length limit has been exceeded.
  • Some change to the message or the destination must be made for successful delivery. [RFC3463] (Standards track) G.
  • This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it or assist in its implementation may be prepared,
  • Normative References [RFC2821] Klensin, J., "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol", RFC 2821, April 2001. [RFC3463] Vaudreuil, G., "Enhanced Mail System Status Codes", RFC 3463, January 2003. [RFC3886] Allman, E., "An Extensible Message
  • Since the bounce codes are not generated by Pardot, the explanation from our Supportteam will be limited to the table below.
  • The ESMTP status codes are additions to the classic code and consist of digits devided by dots (5.1.1 User unknown.).
  • In combination with other information provided in the Delivery Status Notification (DSN) delivery report, these codes facilitate media and language independent rendering of message delivery status.
  • July 2011 Admin 16 Comments The classic SMTP error code consists of three digits (e.g. 220 mail.domain.tld SMTP ready.).

Don’t try again. 500 5.5.1 Syntax error, command unrecognized. 503 5.5.0 Sender e-mail address already specified. 503 5.5.1 Need MAIL before RCPT. 544 5.4.4 Host not found (not in DNS). 550 This reference should note whether the relevant specification is standards-track, best current practice, or neither, using one of "(Standards track)", "(Best current practice)" or "(Not standards track)". Hansen & Klensin Best Current Practice [Page 3] RFC 5248 SMTP Enhanced Status Code Registry June 2008 Submitter: The identity of the submitter, usually the document author. Smtp Codes 240 Many times you see both types of code combined (e.g. 550 5.1.1 User unknown).

sections 3.1 through 3.8 of [RFC3463], (X.0.0, X.1.0 through X.1.8, X.2.0 through X.2.4, X.3.0 through X.3.5, X.4.0 through X.4.7, X.5.0 through X.5.5, X.6.0 through X.6.5, and X.7.0 through X.7.7), 2. This memo does not discuss the merits of any such filtering, but provides a mechanism to report such. For more information about the rules to create, transmit and process an email you can check out our publication on The SMTP Protocol Fundamentals. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/256321 Vaudreuil Lucent Technologies 7291 Williamson Rd Dallas, Tx. 75214 Phone: +1 214 823 9325 EMail: [email protected] Vaudreuil Standards Track [Page 15] RFC 3463 Enhanced Mail System Status Codes January 2003 Full

Klensin IESG X.7.15 Priority Level is too low 450, 550 (other 4XX or 5XX codes are allowed) The specified priority level is below the lowest priority acceptable for the receiving SMTP Enhanced Status Code Transport Rule X.3.5 System incorrectly configured The system is not configured in a manner that will permit it to accept this message. X.6.1 Media not supported The media of the message is not supported by either the delivery protocol or the next system in the forwarding path. thanks in advance Reply TJEdens Staff 10,077 Points 2015-10-15 3:13 pm Hello Rich, How many emails are you trying to send out at one time?

Smtp Status Codes 240

Vaudreuil IESG X.3.YYY Mail System Status Mail system status indicates that something having to do with the destination system has caused this DSN. They are not intended for system specific diagnostics. Smtp Reply Codes Vaudreuil IESG 5.XXX.YYY Permanent Failure A permanent failure is one which is not likely to be resolved by resending the message in the current form. Smtp Error Codes 550 The enhanced SMTP bounce responses are three-digits separated by decimal points (e.g., 5.1.1).

Vaudreuil, and change controlled by the IESG. navigate to this website The general semantics imply that one recipient alone won’t be able to free enough space to make room for new mails. For example, 5.2.1 is a Permanent Error where the receiving email is not accepting messages. Below is a list of the Standard SMTP error codes and the Extended SMTP (ESMTP) error codes. Enhanced Status Code Exchange 2010

Delany IESG {{offlineMessage}} Store Store home Devices Microsoft Surface PCs & tablets Xbox Virtual reality Accessories Windows phone Software Office Windows Additional software Apps All apps Windows apps Windows phone apps Such prohibitions may be the expression of the sender in the message itself or the policy of the sending host. Example: 5.4.4, status=bounced (Host or domain name not found. http://ipodcorrectors.com/error-codes/smtp-return-error-codes.php Vaudreuil Standards Track [Page 7] RFC 3463 Enhanced Mail System Status Codes January 2003 X.2.4 Mailing list expansion problem The mailbox is a mailing list address and the mailing list was

If this code accompanies a delivery failure report, sending in the future may be successful. Smtp Error Codes Rfc SMTP Enhanced Status Codes Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2.2. Informative References [RFC1893] Vaudreuil, G., "Enhanced Mail System Status Codes", RFC 1893, January 1996. [RFC5226] Narten, T.

Initial Values The initial values for the class and subject sub-code tables are to be populated from section 2 of [RFC3463].

The tables below are not a definitive list of all available bounce codes, only a representation of the most frequent ones. In UAT environment the mail is successfully sent. X.2.XXX Mailbox Status Mailbox status indicates that something having to do with the mailbox has caused this DSN. Smtp Code 334 This is useful for both permanent and persistent transient errors.

SMTP Enhanced Status Codes Registry IANA has created the registry "SMTP Enhanced Status Codes". This is useful only as a persistent transient error. Newman IESG X.6.7 Non-ASCII addresses not permitted for that sender/recipient 553, 550 This indicates the reception of a MAIL or RCPT command that non-ASCII addresses are not permitted [RFC6531] (Standards track) click site This is a very typical Postfix error where the destination mailbox doesn’t exist.

These may include any implementation errors or un-trusted network connections.       X.6.XXX Format or mail content status This code reports failures that involve the content of the mail. Vaudreuil IESG Enumerated Status Codes Registration Procedure(s) Specification Required Expert(s) Chris Newman Reference [RFC5248] Available Formats CSV Code Sample Text Associated basic status code Description Reference Submitter Change Controller X.0.0 Other Name service error for name=domain.com type=AAAA: Host not found) This situations usually falls on the sender’s responsibility as most of the time the user typed a non-existent domain by mistake. This may result if a heuristic address mapping algorithm is used to map the specified address to a local mailbox name.

Detail sub-codes may provide notification of transformations required for delivery. These problems may be the responsibility of  both sender and recipient. Vaudreuil IESG X.3.4 Message too big for system 552, 554 The message is larger than per-message size limit. Example: BA13F20ABD: from=, status=expired, returned to sender In this example from Postfix’s maillog the status code 5.4.7 was assumed to log this line.

and H. X.5.XXX Mail Delivery Protocol Status The mail delivery protocol status codes report failures involving the message delivery protocol. Documents defining security error codes should make it clear when this is the case so SMTP server software subject to such threats can provide appropriate controls to restrict exposure. For some reason when I send from my home email, it comes back with the 554 5.1.8 code.

Vaudreuil IESG X.7.3 Security conversion required but not possible Not given A conversion from one secure messaging protocol to another was required for delivery and such conversion was not possible. This code is useful for permanent errors. It may include address syntax or validity. An example of this situation is when the sender types a wrong domain name like “gnail” instead of “gmail”.

Example: C> MAIL FROM:[email protected] SIZE=9999999999 S> 552 5.3.4 Message size exceeds file system imposed limit In this case no action from the sender or recipient can result in a successful delivery Vaudreuil Standards Track [Page 5] RFC 3463 Enhanced Mail System Status Codes January 2003 3.1 Other or Undefined Status X.0.0 Other undefined Status Other undefined status is the only undefined error Example: 2.1.23 The code space defined is intended to be extensible only by standards track documents. smtp error [221] 2.0.0 bye what does this mean & how do i sort it?

NOTE: This is a non-exclusive list. X.6.1   Media not supported The media of the message is not supported by either the delivery protocol or the next system in the forwarding path.